|
stevey323 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Heath Ledger FTMFW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Gojirafan101 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
It is not Heath Ledger vs. Jack Nicholson but Heath Ledger vs. Mark Hamill's Joker from the Animated Series. I think both sides of the Joker that I love
Heath Ledger for being crazy clever and insane
Mark Hamill for being clever funny and crazy
mcnarycelt75 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
heath's voice, looks, and overall character is an absolute masterpiece, i dont think anyone will ever be able to replace that performance
S1cKSh0T477 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Heaatthhhh.....
Erica9993 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
That was an amazing vid!! great job!!
That should've been a trailer.
VitalSignsL0w (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
the voice and make up on heath are better
reginaron (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
1.Cesar Romero.
Don't even bother to try to replace him.
1940's comic book Joker is scarier than, anything else. And Cesar had nothing else to go on..Batman was only 25 yrs. old then.
2.End the Jack vs. Heath Debate!
4.Heath because he was told to act like Joker, not, campy.
3.Jack Nicholson was great as "Joker"!! Especially his smile.
LestatandBerial (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
They were both good jokers. But I have to go with Heath Ledger. He was a joker by choice. JAck fell into a vat and became joker. Ledger's the way he is because he wants to. Not because he was forced.
shadow1dx (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The script does matter but to an extent, you can't base preparation and performance over a script. Heath went to a hotel room for a month living by himself, practicing the voice, laugh and mental state of the Joker.
Although I agree with everything else you said.
ZoKayComputer (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I would have enjoyed Jack more if Tim Burton wasn't the director; his stlye (in this case) annoys the hell out of me. |
