Search:

Car boot sale

Genetically Modified Food Issues - Educational Video Part 1

Window Cleaning Poles
Window Cleaning Poles Window Cleaning Poles
Window Cleaning Poles

Fed Up! Genetic Engineering, Industrial Agriculture, and Sustainable Alternatives. About 70% of the food we eat contains genetically modified ingredients and is not labeled. The biotechnology industry is spending $50 million a year to convince us that this technology is our only hope for feeding the world and saving the environment. Family farmers are disappearing at an astonishing rate as people continue to go hungry both here and abroad. Using hilarious and disturbing archival footage and featuring interviews with farmers, scientists, government officials and activists, FED UP! presents an entertaining, informative and compelling overview of our food production system from the Green Revolution to the Biotech Revolution and what we can do about it. An issue that has entered the mainstream media in a lot of countries (noticeably not really in the US) is Genetic Engineering (GE) or Genetic Modification (GM) of food. A lot of food that we eat today contains genetically modified ingredients and usually without our knowledge. Supporters of this technology maintain that it ensures and sustains food security around the world as the population increases. As time goes on, the science behind genetic engineering is no doubt improving. Biotechnology could be the wave of the future and genetically modified foods could really provide alternatives to help increase food production. However, there is a growing wave of concern from citizens, farmers and scientists who question the way the research is currently being handled by a few large, profit-hungry corporations. That is, as well as scientific debates on the merits of genetically engineered food, there are equally, if not more important, debates on the socioeconomic ramifications of the way such science is marketed and used. Critics believe: The problem of food shortages is a political and economic problem. Food shortages and hunger are -- and will be -- experienced by the poorer nations. GE Food is an expensive technology that the farmers of the developing nations would not be able to afford easily. Patenting laws go against the poor around the world and allow biotech companies to benefit from patenting indigenous knowledge often without consent. This is a very young and untested technology and may not be the answer just yet. Crop uniformity, which the biotech firms are promoting, will reduce genetic diversity making them more vulnerable to disease and pests. This furthers the need for pesticides (often created by the same companies creating and promoting genetically engineered crops). Hence this leads to questions of the motives of corporations and countries who are using the plight of the developing world as a marketing strategy to gain acceptance of GE food as well as dependency upon it via intellectual property rights. That they are against any labeling or other precautionary steps and measures that states may wish to take is of paramount concern. The way in which we reach the answer to the question, "are GE foods safe?" is where a lot of the problem lies. A quick acceptance of GE foods without proper testing etc. could show corporate profitability to be very influential, while a thorough debate and sufficient public participation would ensure that real social and environmental concerns are in fact adhered to. And this pattern would probably indicate to us how other major issues in the future ought to be dealt with. There is also the issue of do we actually need genetically engineered food, given that agriculture in small biodiverse farms are actually very productive. Economics and politics at all levels, (international, national and local) have often prevented food from reaching hungry people, not a lack of production. These same causes have also created, or contributed to, a lot of poverty, which prevents people from being able to afford food in the first place. This section then, looks more into the political issues behind the emerging promotion of biotechnology and genetically modified or engineered foods. Producer: Angelo Sacerdote. Production Company: Wholesome Goodness Productions. Keywords: food; agriculture; genetically modified food; biotechnology. Creative Commons license: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
Author: rosaryfilms

Length: 19:46
Rating: 4.50
Views: 5893

Tags: agriculture  alternatives  biotech  biotechnology  engineering  farming  genetic  industrial  organic  revolution  sustainable  USA  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

jokers32463 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
One question, As a Americian, our food and water is suppose to be the cleanest in the world, why are we Americians getting Diabetes? I'm just 45 years old and this was not here when I was a kid, No I don't have it, but I worry about it. Anyway, every year, when they talk about the oldest person in the world, it's always somebody, in a 3rd world country,and how does that happens? Year after year? How people in other countries out live Americians, when everything here is suppose to be better
Sotigris (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
sigh.... we are going to have cancer after all
shishimenz (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
dude: the FDA doesn't care about people...it cares about LOBBIESTS!!! the FDA is just like any politician. Period.
GaGirlie777 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I'll let you make your own inference. Do some research on depopulation plan.
behram11 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I don't understand what you are saying GaGirlie777. The FDA is set out to protect American Citizens, then why in the world would they want to do the complete opposite. So does that mean that the US government in against it's own citizens.
williamstdog9 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
And who are the people sitting on these boards? Much of the time they are ex- monsanto employees. Please look up the info. These people are bought and sold many times over. There's at least 4 exp.s of this in the last decade not including Don Rumsfeld who was the president of Searle around the same time as passing aspartame through the FDA. Please do your homework.
GaGirlie777 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I agree with you . Thanks for posting.
GaGirlie777 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
If the FDA promotes something, then I know something is up. Look at the history of the FDA. Everything that they approved over the years and look at what it has done to people. Now the FDA is trying to outlaw vitamins. The FDA is not your friend.
hepster121 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Yeah but what if they could make a tree the grows people think about it
KVLai (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I don't think those so called "GMO" sceintist eat what they produce. Any of us here who's good at investigation skills may go and "EXPOSE" what "these people" eat. It may as well they plant their own "healthy organic food" at home for their own comsumption. The rest of it which is not approved by "Advanced" country is systmatically dumped to so called 2nd. or 3rd. world country like mine. There is no indication at all where my food is coming from let alone any labels at all.

Car Boot Sales © 2007 All Rights Reserved.